To the Thirteen White Male Senators Deciding the Fate of My Health Care

We have no interest in playing the games of identity politics. To reduce this to gender, race or geography misses the more important point of the diverse segments of the conference the group represents on policy — from members who support Medicaid expansion, to those opposed to it, to those who have called for long-term full repeal.”

Dear Senators,

All due respect, but I believe it’s you who are missing the important point. You cannot reduce to gender or race–but you can expand to them.

You presume, you thirteen white men, to make decisions and policies which will affect all of us, from sea to shining sea. You assume we will trust you, because until recently, we’ve had no choice but to trust you. But I don’t. I don’t trust you. You don’t represent me. I don’t mean party politics, Republican or Democrat. I mean you have never experienced the need for female driven policy, or policy that focuses on race, or centers issues unique to the LGBTQ community. Because you are none of those things.

Female driven policy is different. Race driven policy is different. LGBTQ driven policy is different. And that is a good thing. It brings diversity to the table. It’s Thai on Monday and sushi on Thursday instead of meatloaf every, single night. It means the needs of others, needs that are different from your own, are brought to the forefront. It is taking and shaping the experiences of those identities and using them, smartly, to craft broader policy.

Senator McConnell, have you ever found yourself unexpectedly pregnant, halfway through high school, unable to afford to raise a child? Have you, Senator Hatch ever been the victim of a rape? How about you, Senator Cruz? Have you ever been refused medication because a nurse perceived you to be exaggerating your pain levels simply because you’re black?


Senator Alexander, have you ever had to use a breast pump at work?  Have you ever needed to limp into work with stitches holding your cervix together, Senator Thune? Senator Lee, have you left your six-week old infant at daycare while your breasts leaked with milk, because you were afraid to lose your job? How about you, Senator Enzi? Ever walk into work, bleeding due to a miscarriage, unable to take time off from work?


Senator Cotton, have you ever looked at the maternal death rates for black women and worried, will that be me? Senator Cornyn, have you read the infant mortality rates for black infants and worried if the child you were carrying inside you would die?


How can you, thirteen white men, craft a comprehensive health care plan which must include women and people of color and LGBTQ without including them in your debate and decision-making process?

It is presumptuous and condescending and dangerous. And yet it is par for the course.

There is no identity politics. There is America. There is diversity. There is us. We are those identities, and those identities define our politics in the sense that they must be given a voice in any policy that is going to last.

You ask us to trust you, yet you routinely and rather spectacularly at times fail to earn that trust. You fail not necessarily because you are trying to punish or withhold, though certainly that is sometimes true, but often because you just don’t know any better. Why would family leave and maternity coverage and reproductive rights be at the top of your list? Why would funding to find out why black mothers die at a higher rate, and black babies die more frequently be important to you? After all, those policies, those politics, aren’t part of your identity.

But they’re part of ours.

Anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow confine of those that will sit around your table has the word identity attached to them. Card-carrying members. Race, gender, sex. When we try to point out the ludicrousness of trying to craft policy without the representation of those groups, we are accused of playing a card. As if we were cheating at poker instead of trying to save our own lives.

We’re demanding a seat at the table. Because, to paraphrase Cecile Richards, if we do not have a seat at the table, we are on the menu.

When your surrogates claim women are using Medicaid funds for abortions to ‘travel’, or that women who want abortions can go to the zoo, you fail. You fail when you admit you don’t know why women seek abortions. You fail when you don’t demand mandatory maternity coverage. You fail when you don’t craft humane family leave policy. You fail when you don’t ensure that victims of domestic and sexual abuse will be given health care. You fail when you don’t take into account the way Americans of color and Americans in rural areas are underserved by hospitals and doctors. You fail and you fail.

But your biggest failure is insisting that you have the ability and experience to make decisions for all of us, without our input.

You fail because you are thirteen white heterosexual men…only. And you always have been. The number has changed, but the homogeny has not.

Imagine if this committee was made up of thirteen black women. Or thirteen gay men. Imagine if it were made up of thirteen members that did not include a white, hetero, cisgendered, Christian male. Would you feel like your needs were being met? The issues important to you given consideration? Yet that is what you continually ask us all to do, time and time again. To trust you to represent us.

So no, I do not expect you to come up with a bill that will do right by women, or by Americans of color. Or by the poor, or anyone else who must carry with them the tag of ‘identity’ with them wherever they go. Because anytime you have a group that is without diversity of thought and experience, you’re bound to fail.

You have failed us enough. Why should this time be any different?

16 Comments Add yours

  1. skaymac says:

    Nailed it! Just another bunch of white men in suits who think they know what’s best for womenfolk.


    1. Dina Honour says:

      The thing that bothers me the most? It would be easy enough to branch out and try to get a broader view. But they stubbornly refuse–on purpose, I think.


  2. Hoo-ah! You said it.


    1. Dina Honour says:

      And I didn’t even swear!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I am internally fist pumping and screaming “Yes, Queen!!!!” But not externally because I’m in a library and that would be rude…

    Still, holy shit this is amazing!!!


    1. Dina Honour says:

      I’m not sure what I love more–the fist pumping of recognition….or the fact that you’re in a library. Libraries rock and rule. Keep rocking and ruling. And fist pumping ;-). (And thank you!)

      Liked by 1 person

  4. nshami14 says:

    Amen, sister. None of them could even survive menstrual cramps or postpartum. If they had to walk a year (or a lifetime) in our shoes, things would change. Instead, we have to keep telling our stories, rattling their conscious, and hoping they get it. One day. Soon.


    1. Dina Honour says:

      Yes! I am a bit (ok, more than a bit) obsessed with the idea of women sharing stories–I think it’s hugely important and we must keep doing it. But we also must get more women (and more diversity on all fronts) seats at the table. Not until there are folks there who are actually affected by the policy they are creating will we see any real change. It’s a long ass time coming though, isn’t it?


      1. nshami14 says:

        A long ass time coming, but the energy keeps rising 4 it, and eventually it will manifest. I believe.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Reblogged this on ravenhawks' magazine and commented:
    This is so on point I had to share it.


    1. Dina Honour says:

      Thank you kindly 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  6. This is excellent. Wish it were required reading for the committee.


    1. Dina Honour says:

      Thanks. I wish it didn’t have to be! This is one of those things that is easy enough to begin to remedy (not the outcome would necessarily be any different)–but what bothers me the most is the arrogance of assumption that even today, when the diversity is there for the picking, we must trust such a homogenous group to keep our best interests in mind.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Autumn Cote says:

    Would it be OK if I cross-posted this article to I’ll be sure to give you complete credit as the author. There is no fee; I’m simply trying to add more content diversity for our commrunity and I enjoyed reading your work. If “OK” please let me know via email.



Talk to me, Goose.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.